GlobalEdg - The Global Executive Development Group
Decrease Text SizeIncrease Text Size
GlobalEdg - The Global Executive Development Group
Build the leadership capabilities required to create high-performance organizational cultures in which people see true value and meaning in their work.

Invite People In

June 17th, 2010

     Co-creation makes a big difference. How many times in your career have you been “left out” of crucial conversations that you felt you felt you should have been part of. Culture in any organizations can be found in the hallways conversations that take place in organizations. Co-creating plans is one of the most important businesses tools a manager can use. It also sets the stage for flawless execution. This doesn’t mean everyone needs to be included in everything. Invite people in the right way — not everyone needs the same degree of engagement. We like to use the APS method. We find it extremely useful for teams deciding who and how to invite people in and who is accountable for what.

A= Accountable “Owns” the plan and deliverable
P= Partner – Owns the plan just like “A” can’t point to if it doesn’t get  done, often process owner responsible for delivering
S= Stakeholders
     a) Consulted (opinions sought) two way communications
     b) Informed (kept up-to-date) –one way communication

Post a Comment

Change: The Intersection between Wisdom and Adaptability.

June 16th, 2010

 

     I was asked if I would be willing to speak to a group of seniors as part of an ongoing speaker series. I chose a topic that I thought would be interesting…it turned into one of my most memorable experiences and a lesson in wisdom. The topic, Leadership in Times of Change turned into a 90 minute dialogue about changes in society, discussion around what the future might hold, and a look at how all ages are adapting to the challenges of our times.

     The average age at the facility…..89! I first asked the group how many in the room were over age 50 — that drew a big laugh. We got down to business. After a show of hands and adding the life experience in the room we accounted for thousands of years living through change. Discussing the changes they had seen in their lifetime, we talked about everything from cars, to electricity, moral values, the computer….the list went on. It was a very rich discussion.
What did I learn? The intersection between wisdom and adaptability was a big “ah ha” for me. They had to deal with more change during their lifetime than many of us will ever experience. Seeing everything from the Great Depression, to World War and in some cases 2, the baby boom, technology revolutions…they could show adaptability and provide wisdom. Over ½ of the audience were using cell phones, working on the computer or taking advantage of the newest technologies in banking, shopping, healthcare and communications. The common theme — embrace it with curiosity and a hunger to try it! These seniors are able to reflect on their own experiences, use a filter we do not have and create different assumptions and ask questions rooted in deep knowledge about profound change. What a gift for me!

Post a Comment

Taking complexity out of your business and ultimately your life —What do you stop doing?

June 15th, 2010

     While browsing through today’s Wall Street Journal health journal section, I can across an interesting, but not surprising statistic.  A recent survey found that 56% of the people say they are in more in need of a vacation that in past years. Of all work /life balance issues I have found in my work, one of the most obviously happens unintentionally. When a small team of people working together to produce outstanding results they often come to a breaking point. They can not sustain the current way they operate due to the added complexity of what they are trying to manage. Projects get added and what usually happens?  They continue to add “stuff” without taking anything off of the plate. They do not collectively ask themselves, “What can we stop doing?” Individuals heroically try to continue providing value to internal or external customers –often at the expense to their personal well being. A tried solution –- run an exercise with your team on what to stop doing – try it. It will immediately relieve the organizational, team and individual stress levels.  

 

Post a Comment

The Myth of Self-motivation

May 14th, 2010

While facilitating a team of executives recently, one of the leaders talked about how the newer and younger employees were not self-motivated. I asked what that meant. “They are not as committed to the organization and what we are trying to do.” When I asked what they were committed to do, it was hard for him to articulate that.
Try this on — look through a different lens. Work hard to find out what your employees are committed to – use that as a starting point. When we work with teams that are struggling, the first question I ask the group is, “Who in here comes to work each day trying to screw up?” After much laughter, I ask if they believed the same of their people. It really is an “ah ha” moment. I encourage you to look through a different lens. As a manager, what types of environment are you creating that allow your team to commit to doing their best each day? It’s amazing how this simple approach can make a difference in organizations.

Post a Comment

Has Toyota lost its Strategic Competitive Advantage?

February 9th, 2010

     Talk about a challenge to a brand! Think about it — over the last 90 days, how has the Toyota brand changed in the eyes of consumers? Toyota’s competitive advance in the eyes of the consumer has been its reputation for quality. This is a great lesson on how to never lose focus on how you differentiate yourselves with the consumer. Identifying what makes you unique is an important part of what makes strategic thinking come alive for organizations.

     Toyota’s production system has long been admired by companies for quality. Ryozo Yoshikawa, a professor of manufacturing Management at the University of Tokyo, indicates forgetting about its consumers has led to Toyota’s problems.
The executives in any organization that does not always think strategically and focus on what is best for the consumer, is not going to win long-term in today’s marketplace.

What do you think?

Post a Comment

Are Strategic Plans Obsolete?

January 28th, 2010

    

            In this week’s Wall Street Journal Article “Strategic Plans Lose Favor”  (January 25, 2010— link below) the questions were surfaced about the value of  Strategic Plans. It really brings the conversation front and center.

The world has changed and those companies that have not invested time in building the capability of their organization to think strategically could be in trouble.

A plan that is built and shared at only at the top of the organization will just not work.

The strategic plans that we see working are living documents! They are collectively built, fact-based, externally focused and flexible. They have mechanisms to quickly address and communicate what an organization should start, stop or continue on a regular basis.  

Leaders in every function and at all levels are trained to think and act strategically so that the organization is alert every day, week and month to renew their strategy.

 

All the best, Paul

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703822404575019283591121478.html

Post a Comment

People Want to Make a Difference

November 27th, 2009

 

          This is the most important lesson leaders must learn in order to be successful.  Sure they have to have the technical skills to get the job done, a strong understanding of how the organization works; however, nothing takes place of being able to understand this simple idea!

          I had breakfast with an officer of a Fortune 50 company recently. We were having a conversation about the capabilities of some of the executives in their organization.  I asked the question, “who on your staff shows up to work each day trying to lose money for the company?”  After a broad smile he looked at me and said “nobody.”  Our conversation, then focused on why it is important to find out what people are really committed to?  One of the most important lessons I learned early in my management career was a person can become compliant and help, but can really carry the organization if they are committed. I realized that “my” success or failure depended on understanding this.  Peter Drucker put it more bluntly – writing:Every failure is a failure of a manager.’” I would take it even further and suggest every failure of leader is to not understand what people are really committed to and then leverage that for the good of the individual and the organization.

Post a Comment

“Easing the Pain” — Annual Performance Management Conversations

October 28th, 2009

What would you rather do? — visit the dentist or have complete annual; performance reviews. With all apologies to the very noble dental community, a manager we were working with recently eluded to the fact the chair would be a better option for her.
Why are discussions difficult for people? Two reasons usually surface to the top. 1) The Forms. A form-driven process with deadlines for completion and sign-offs gets in the way of the true reason for performance reviews. Change the lens you look through — a form should not get in the way of having a robust discussion about performance and development. It is not about the form! Anyone who uses the form as a driver for a discussion about performance is out-of-touch with their employee. Ongoing discussion around objectives and development should not be a surprise during the annual review. It should be summations of the conversations that have taken place between the manger and the emplyee during the course of the year. 2) A conversation focused solely on performance and not development. We encourage our clients to purposely change the name from Performance Management or Appraisal to Performance Development. We are looking for people in organizations who come to work trying to lose money for the company they work for — and we have yet to find them. We believe everyone has strengths and opportunities for development. It is only by focusing on both that people can contribute and do their best.

Post a Comment

Think Performance Contribution and see what happens

October 23rd, 2009

Think Performance Contribution and See What Happens

     Leadership comes from anywhere in the organization. Leadership is about looking into the future – creating something that you put in place to enhance people’s contribution. Leadership is about co-creating a future where people are allowed to contribute and make a difference. We were working with a client yesterday and much of our conversation centered on their “Performance Management” process. We talked about how people dreaded the first quarter of the fiscal year – because it was “performance management”
     What would happen if we changed how we framed the conversation during the performance review process? My colleague Dr. Barry Stein of Goodmeasure, often talks about “performance management” as time to speak about “performance contribution.” Think about it, how would leadership in organizations be impacted?

Post a Comment

The External Boss

October 21st, 2009

Who is the boss?

It is a beautiful fall morning in Connecticut and I just took my car through the local car wash. It is one of those places where you have an assembly line of workers who vacuum and dry off your car after it has been washed. It is 8:10 and my car is the first one through this morning.
      I walk up as it is being finished and hand my receipt to the crew supervisor. I thank him and tell him the car looks great. He comments on how glad he is to be able to serve me so efficiently this morning. “We are working with a skeleton crew again this morning — yesterday our customers were furious, we had the same number of workers, but unlike this morning, we were very busy. People were waiting over 20 minutes for their cars. I don’t schedule the workers, I just supervise the one’s who are here. The scheduling is done in the front office.”
     As I drove away, it struck me how often we come across this in business. We see someone who is the “face to the customer” working to satisfy their needs without the ability to influence the outcome. Sometimes a “boss” gets in the way. Doesn’t everything from a three- year plan to every customer touch-point make a difference? P&G’s former CEO A.G. Lafley had mantra for that help to crystallize how every should think about the business — The consumer is boss.

Who is your boss? How to relate to internal bosses to serve external ones?

Post a Comment